WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners. By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles. Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime. |
Exhibition of Healthcare Services at 2023 CIFTISLetter from Lhasa: Running a MiniVillages Become Entrepreneurship Hubs for Youngsters in ChongqingVillage Super League, new gala for ethnic culture in SW ChinaExhibition of Healthcare Services at 2023 CIFTISTorch Relay of 19th Asian Games Continues in JinhuaShanghai Hosts Tourism Festival to Boost ConsumptionHandmade Dolls Bring Fortunes to Local Residents in SW China's CountyDay 4 Roundup: China Continues Dominance with 23 Golds, Another Shooting World Record ShatteredCalligraphy, Painting Industry Thrives in E China's County